Conclusion
Innovative applications like Mathematica need to be understood
in the multiple contexts created by the co-evolution of culture and
technology. In this regard, metaphoric approaches may be be useful, for
example comparing the development of Mathematica notebooks to the
early history of cinema. [28] We must also keep in mind the
basic
principle: Synaptic Law is not Moore's Law! No matter how smart computers get, human synapses still require time to form new connections.
Nevertheless, it is hard to suppress excitement as we reflect on the ideas of visionary thinkers such as Stan Ulam, who wrote forty years ago on the possibility of using computers as a heuristic aid:
In addition to, and in some aspects quite beyond the
above type
of use of electronic computing machines, one can conceive more general
possibilities for large scale experimentation on problems of pure
mathematics or in exploration of tentative ideas in physical
theories.... [29]
This statement came from a time of punch-card input and fan-fold paper
output from large machines [physically, but puny in terms of today's
laptop capacities] that most users never came close to. Today, to students
doing their homework with Calculus WIZ, this must not seem such a
remarkable idea at all.
| |